Archive for the ‘Idiots’ Category

Radical Thinking

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

David Cameron seems to be drawing some flak for having made what seems to me to be a perfectly sensible suggestion, namely that council houses should really be for those who need them, rather than those who at some point in their lives needed them but now really should be moving on.

I find myself swayed, however, by the unstinting logic of both Simon Hughes and the commenters on the Guardian link above. I’ve therefore come up with a couple of other suggestions that follow the same pattern that I think we should introduce as quickly as possible.

(1) People should be assessed for income tax purposes once and once only, at the beginning of their working career, thus giving everyone a clear and unchanging understanding of their tax liability. This assessment should be backdated in order to be fair to existing taxpayers.

In my case, I started full-time work in the summer of 1983 but as I was due to go to University later that tax year, I didn’t earn enough to actually pay anything other than NI. So, I should really be paying no tax now, and indeed I should be entitled to a refund of all tax paid since I started work.

(2) If someone has to go to hospital, they should retain the right to stay in the ward indefinitely, even when they’ve got better. This is only fair, because there’s little doubt that they will have got used to the nice comfortable bed, having their meals prepared for them and constant attention from doctors and nurses (irony alert – this is the NHS, after all).

Please feel free to make further suggestions. I will collate the best ones and post them to Mr Hughes, so that when he breaks up the coalition and is subsequently voted into power he will have a few ideas to start with.

Bad Science v The Poo Lady

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Thought I’d share this as I know not everyone is on Twitter and it’s been keeping me entertained this week.

Story so far is here

Ben Goldacre’s feed

Poo Lady’s feed (Oh yes it is! Oh no it isn’t! Oh yes it is!)

Poo Lady’s web site with commented out Twitter link. (View Source and scroll down to the Social Networks bit).

Dara O’Briain’s feed

Leadership In Crisis

Friday, July 9th, 2010

One of the great things about the internet is how you start looking at one topic and end up looking at something else that’s equally, if not more, interesting.

I found this essay by William Deresiewicz on Solitude and Leadership whilst following a thread on the Mini Microsoft blog about the demise of the KIN and how the Danger team seem to have been actively demotivated by incompetent management and marketing wonks at Microsoft in the time immediately after the buyout.

In particular, this caught my eye :-

Excellence isn’t usually what gets you up the greasy pole. What gets you up is a talent for maneuvering. Kissing up to the people above you, kicking down to the people below you. Pleasing your teachers, pleasing your superiors, picking a powerful mentor and riding his coattails until it’s time to stab him in the back. Jumping through hoops. Getting along by going along. Being whatever other people want you to be, so that it finally comes to seem that, like the manager of the Central Station, you have nothing inside you at all. Not taking stupid risks like trying to change how things are done or question why they’re done. Just keeping the routine going.

Finally, maybe, we’re starting to wake up to what is fundamentally wrong with Western business ethos.

Incidentally, if you read the Mini Microsoft blog and wonder if it’s just a bunch of whiny techies … no, I think not. My recent experience in this business area suggests that this sort of thing is all too common. Most of the people doing the actual work know what customers want – after all, a lot of them are customers themselves. Those calling the shots, on the other hand, give the impression that they’ve never even seen the internet, let alone a smartphone.

I fear this is all too common across all aspects of our business lives.

In The Mire

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

You are responsible for spills.

Here’s an interesting piece from George Monbiot about the ongoing BP fiasco.

Don’t get me wrong, I think George is nutty as a fruitcake and as off the mark with this as he is with just about everything else, especially as he seems to conveniently ignore the fact that we all effectively “own” a bit of BP through our pension portfolios, but overall he’s encapsulated a lot of the public feeling on this issue.

This piece from The Onion is much funnier though.

RBS are a bunch of scumbags

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Bunch of Scumbags

RBS Business have just offered my small business a loan today. Its a cash secured loan.  They will lend me £50k if I deposit £50k into a separate account that they hold onto.

Presumably deals like this let them claim they are still doing business and making money available to small business.  How is this type of loan of any real use to the majority of businesses?

I don’t want this to sound like the rant of an annoyed business owner who’s been declined a loan.  It’s the rant of a tax payer who sees his money being lent to an institution who should have been allowed to fail. A tax payer who’s money is now propping up investments in Dubai. A tax payer who’s money is being lavished on massive bonuses. What a bunch of scumbags

I wonder if the terms I am being offered were offered to the Sheikhs or to the bankers themselves?

What a bunch of scumbags

If you post a reply, please include this code:

<a href=”http://www.rbs.co.uk”> bunch of scumbags </a>

to see if we can get rbs into top spot on google for the query “bunch of scumbags”

Pixie Dust

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

potheadpixies

Or maybe tea. That’s what aeroplanes run on. You thought it was JETA1? Silly you!

At least, that’s the only conclusion I can draw from the fact that “Climate change advisers have decided that an extensive building programme at Heathrow — including the construction of a third runway — can proceed without jeopardising the Government’s carbon emissions targets.”

After all, these people are always right. There’s a consensus. Who are we to doubt them?

Please Ignore The Man Behind The Curtain

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

Please ignore the man behind the curtain. Move on ... nothing to see here ...

Please ignore the man behind the curtain. Move on ... nothing to see here ...


Sometimes I wonder if we’re living in Oz, not the once Great Britain.

After a couple of weeks, the Climategate story is starting to gain momentum in the mainstream media, including the Washington Post and even the BBC grudgingly acknowledging the seriousness of the leak and their AGW evangelist environmental correspondent Roger Harrabin discussing the topic. That latter one is a bit rich, given that he hasn’t chosen to refute claims by the Daily Fail and others that he was sent the evidence some weeks earlier but chose to ignore it.

Meanwhile, back in Oz, Our Glorious Leader is telling us that we shouldn’t be distracted by Climategate. Isn’t it a bit rich that the man leading a government that sacks scientists who tell the truth and allegedly refutes any inconvenient argument by saying “I don’t recognize that data” calls those of us who would like to see the Scientific Method more closely adhered to “Flat Earthers”.

Elsewhere in Oz, the BBC are trying to imply that the AGW movement is somehow not part of the mainstream by covering a “protest” by Stop Climate Chaos, referring to them as “Climate Change Activists”. Let me get this right … this facepainting group are running a demo to encourage our government to take AGW more seriously? And this is somehow radical? I need more iron(y) tablets. I agree with the implication of their name, however – it would be nice to stop the chaos surrounding the AGW claims and actually revert to some proper science.

Another story from Oz, which I’ve not been able to find on the BBC site amongst all the coverage of the protesters, is even more boggling. The Met Office have announced that in the light of Climategate they intend to review 160 years’ worth of data, which will take three years. Predictably, HMG are trying to stop them because “it would be seized upon by climate sceptics”, which I assume is code for “not likely to improve our credibility on this issue”. Laughably, I heard someone on R4FM say that because the figures show an increase of 0.7 degrees C in global temperatures over the last 100 years, it “proves that Global Warming is true”. That’s a fudge. No-one is claiming that the figures don’t show that, what’s debatable is whether (a) this is unnatural, (b) not part of a regular cycle, (c) whether the “hockey stick” graphs are good science and (d) this shows anything other than correlation with CO2 emissions as opposed to a causal link.

Finally, if you dig into the BBC’s site a bit deeper, you’ll find a story about oceanic CO2 uptake. This is clearly another aspect of the model that we seem to know less about than we thought.

Anyone seen any ruby slippers?

Waccy Baccy Bankers

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

I’m following the RBS bonus story with some amusement.

Is this a win-win situation? Either the directors resign and the “talented bankers” in question have their bluff called, or the hydra that is Clown-Darling lose even more credibility, assuming that they have any left.

Me? I agree with Vince Cable – call their bluff and let ‘em resign. Surely there aren’t that many jobs out there paying £10M plus?

PS … in case anyone is wondering about the title of this post, it comes from an album on heavy rotation on my current playlist.

Climategate

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Over the last few days I’ve been following the Climategate story and the response to it in the mainstream media. The latter is particularly interesting – I’ve seen little if any reporting of this story on the BBC, whereas The Guardian seem to be covering it quite well, with even George Monbiot admitting that this is important stuff.

My particular interest lies in the software models that form much of the basis of the hysteria being whipped up by the IPCC, especially in the run-up to Copenhagen. I spent a lot of yesterday evening looking at the notes from one particular coder who, it seems, spent years trying (and failing) to reproduce some of the published results.

The downside of this story is that something I’ve feared will happen may well come to pass. With so-called scientists apparently playing fast and loose with the scientific method, the door is now wide open for the anti-science mob to take over the agenda. I may be an AGW sceptic, but that only extends to my discomfort with the way the science has been subsumed by the political and corporate powers-that-be. We do need to look at green issues, but unfortunately if environmentalism is tarnished with the kind of nonsense we’ve been hearing over the last few years, popular opinion is going to swing violently towards anti-science and anti-environmentalism.

Anyway, I’m curious. Have you heard about this story, and if so what is your take on it?

An Open Letter To Lord Mandelsnake

Friday, November 27th, 2009