Archive for the ‘Politicians’ Category

Radical Thinking

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

David Cameron seems to be drawing some flak for having made what seems to me to be a perfectly sensible suggestion, namely that council houses should really be for those who need them, rather than those who at some point in their lives needed them but now really should be moving on.

I find myself swayed, however, by the unstinting logic of both Simon Hughes and the commenters on the Guardian link above. I’ve therefore come up with a couple of other suggestions that follow the same pattern that I think we should introduce as quickly as possible.

(1) People should be assessed for income tax purposes once and once only, at the beginning of their working career, thus giving everyone a clear and unchanging understanding of their tax liability. This assessment should be backdated in order to be fair to existing taxpayers.

In my case, I started full-time work in the summer of 1983 but as I was due to go to University later that tax year, I didn’t earn enough to actually pay anything other than NI. So, I should really be paying no tax now, and indeed I should be entitled to a refund of all tax paid since I started work.

(2) If someone has to go to hospital, they should retain the right to stay in the ward indefinitely, even when they’ve got better. This is only fair, because there’s little doubt that they will have got used to the nice comfortable bed, having their meals prepared for them and constant attention from doctors and nurses (irony alert – this is the NHS, after all).

Please feel free to make further suggestions. I will collate the best ones and post them to Mr Hughes, so that when he breaks up the coalition and is subsequently voted into power he will have a few ideas to start with.

Emergency Budget

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

Delivered confidently and effectively, and sent a clear message to the markets and the ratings agencies. And that message was “we’ve seen what’s happened to Greece and Spain, and we’re taking decisive steps to make sure it doesn’t happen here

Well that’s how I saw it. How about you ?

I Agree With …

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

There’s 24 hours to go and so far there’s been no politics on this blog at all since the General Election was called. I’m hoping that’s because all the contributors (hard-working families, blah blah blah) have been busy rather than for any more dubious reason such as apathy.

So I thought it was time I tied my colours to the mast. Let’s start with some stuff I wholeheartedly agree with.

http://www.stephenfry.com/2010/05/04/how-i-will-vote/

Yes, he’s an awful luvvy, but he’s a pretty smart luvvy and always (IMHO) has something interesting to say.

Of course, it also goes without saying that I will be Voting For A Change. It’s a no-brainer in my constituency, with an MP up to her neck in dubious behaviour with regard to her expenses, although the final straw for me was when she promised to do something about the disgraceful Digital Economy Bill and then just, you know, couldn’t actually be bothered to turn up to the debate itself.

Finally, a couple of things that I broadly agree with but I feel slightly uneasy around the edges.

http://www.progressiveparliament.org.uk/

This alliance seems generally sound but, for example, I worry about the way that concern for “the environment” just means more droning on about AGW.

Last but not least, I was surprised to be broadly in agreement with Anatole Kaletsky in The Times this morning. I’m worried about this, because normally I think his opinions are the most awful tosh.

More On Climategate

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

It looks like Climategate is slowly but surely entering the consciousness of the MSM and by extension the general populace. Unfortunately, it seems you can break FOI laws with impunity if you actually manage to go six months without anyone spotting you doing it.

Meanwhile, I’m oscillating between gobsmacked and incredulous regarding how much these people have got away with. Latest evidence to come to light, a document called Climate Policy – From Rio To Kyoto. The section Politics Enters Into Drafting The IPCC Report (pages 19 / 20) makes very interesting reading. And this has been in the public domain for nearly ten years.

Arrest Blair

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Here’s an interesting little project.

The basic premise is to provide an incentive to those brave enough to attempt a peaceful citizen’s arrest of Tony Blair, for “crimes against peace”.

Before yesterday, I’d have not taken this so seriously, but it does now seem as if HMG were advised that the invasion of Iraq was illegal, yet chose to ignore it.

I’ll be keeping any eye on this to see where it goes.

The Truth About Berlusconi

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Now wouldn’t you just hate to see this happen to Gordon Brown ?

http://www.shof.msrcsites.co.uk/belli.jpg

Pre Budget Report – Those Swingeing Cuts

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

That’s Ireland’s pre budget report I am talking about. Cuts to public sector pay of up to 10%, and also cuts child and unemployment benefit of up to 16 Euros a month. 4bn Euros cut off public spending.

And what do we get ? A delay of the pain until after the election, some cynical tax increases on the hard working middle classes, and a play to the gallery on bankers bonuses and boilers. The Independent puts it very nicely. Darling has ducked his best chance of averting a catastrophic downgrading of the UKs international credit rating next year, a collapse in sterling, soaring interest rates and a rescue from the IMF. As things stand, the next budget he delivers may be written for him by an IMF team in residence at the Treasury.

But what does he care, by the time that comes around he’ll be on the opposition benches heckling George Osbourne.

Get ready for some spiteful times, and big squeezes on your heard earned wealth.

Follow The Money

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Every time I write something about AGW I wonder “Am I being too paranoid? Isn’t this really just another conspiracy theory?”

Then I read stuff like this story in today’s Guardian about a leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations. Read beyond the headline and you’ll find that this leak suggests that more power will end up not in the hands of “rich nations” (that would ultimately be you and me) but the World Bank and the rather sinister sounding GEF.

Pixie Dust

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

potheadpixies

Or maybe tea. That’s what aeroplanes run on. You thought it was JETA1? Silly you!

At least, that’s the only conclusion I can draw from the fact that “Climate change advisers have decided that an extensive building programme at Heathrow — including the construction of a third runway — can proceed without jeopardising the Government’s carbon emissions targets.”

After all, these people are always right. There’s a consensus. Who are we to doubt them?

Please Ignore The Man Behind The Curtain

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

Please ignore the man behind the curtain. Move on ... nothing to see here ...

Please ignore the man behind the curtain. Move on ... nothing to see here ...


Sometimes I wonder if we’re living in Oz, not the once Great Britain.

After a couple of weeks, the Climategate story is starting to gain momentum in the mainstream media, including the Washington Post and even the BBC grudgingly acknowledging the seriousness of the leak and their AGW evangelist environmental correspondent Roger Harrabin discussing the topic. That latter one is a bit rich, given that he hasn’t chosen to refute claims by the Daily Fail and others that he was sent the evidence some weeks earlier but chose to ignore it.

Meanwhile, back in Oz, Our Glorious Leader is telling us that we shouldn’t be distracted by Climategate. Isn’t it a bit rich that the man leading a government that sacks scientists who tell the truth and allegedly refutes any inconvenient argument by saying “I don’t recognize that data” calls those of us who would like to see the Scientific Method more closely adhered to “Flat Earthers”.

Elsewhere in Oz, the BBC are trying to imply that the AGW movement is somehow not part of the mainstream by covering a “protest” by Stop Climate Chaos, referring to them as “Climate Change Activists”. Let me get this right … this facepainting group are running a demo to encourage our government to take AGW more seriously? And this is somehow radical? I need more iron(y) tablets. I agree with the implication of their name, however – it would be nice to stop the chaos surrounding the AGW claims and actually revert to some proper science.

Another story from Oz, which I’ve not been able to find on the BBC site amongst all the coverage of the protesters, is even more boggling. The Met Office have announced that in the light of Climategate they intend to review 160 years’ worth of data, which will take three years. Predictably, HMG are trying to stop them because “it would be seized upon by climate sceptics”, which I assume is code for “not likely to improve our credibility on this issue”. Laughably, I heard someone on R4FM say that because the figures show an increase of 0.7 degrees C in global temperatures over the last 100 years, it “proves that Global Warming is true”. That’s a fudge. No-one is claiming that the figures don’t show that, what’s debatable is whether (a) this is unnatural, (b) not part of a regular cycle, (c) whether the “hockey stick” graphs are good science and (d) this shows anything other than correlation with CO2 emissions as opposed to a causal link.

Finally, if you dig into the BBC’s site a bit deeper, you’ll find a story about oceanic CO2 uptake. This is clearly another aspect of the model that we seem to know less about than we thought.

Anyone seen any ruby slippers?